Selected work sample · Organisational redesign

Turning a leadership gap into a stronger operating model

Rather than replace a departing functional Head like-for-like, I redesigned Operations around end-to-end ownership. The monthly operating cost run rate fell by approximately 50% over 18 months while delivery speed, quality and customer experience improved.

01 / Context

The departure exposed a wider ownership problem.

At a European digital music distribution platform serving approximately 300,000 active artists and labels, the Head of QA & Delivery announced their departure. The expected response was to recruit an external replacement for the same role. The 14-person department needed daily leadership, an escalation point and someone able to translate admin-tool and platform problems for Engineering.

As Head of Artist & Label Relations (Customer Support), I saw the wider issue from the customer side. Releases moved through separate teams without a single end-to-end owner. Incomplete requirements, lost hand-offs and late technical escalations surfaced as missing or delayed releases and artist complaints.

10 daysAverage internal delivery time
1 to 2 daysTypical lead time after aggregator acceptance
No single ownerAcross the complete release journey

02 / Strategic decision

Replace the structure, not the vacancy.

Within one week, before HR published the vacancy, I proposed combining Artist & Label Relations, QA & Delivery and related specialist functions under my leadership.

The model created one accountable Operations owner, developed internal Team Leads and avoided the cost and onboarding time of an external Head. It also gave the COO one clear point of accountability without adding another management layer.

01

Commercial logic

Reduce recruitment time and operating cost while maintaining continuity.

02

Operating logic

Give the full release journey one accountable leader and clearer escalation paths.

03

Talent logic

Create meaningful leadership scope for proven internal operators.

The COO approved the proposal during the outgoing Head’s notice period. Planned leave reduced the effective handover to approximately two weeks.

03 / Execution

A practical operating system, built around the work.

The redesign combined structure, workflow, data and product changes. The aim was not more process; it was earlier visibility, clearer ownership and fewer preventable exceptions.

  1. Map the whole journey

    I documented the path from paid release registration through quality and specialist checks, aggregator delivery, publication and post-release support. The map made the missing end-to-end owner visible.

  2. Define accountable measures

    I introduced Delivery Time and delivery lead time, set a 21-day lead-time target, and combined SQL and Metabase data with admin-tool and Help Scout reporting.

  3. Build leadership from within

    I integrated six operating units, appointed internal Team Leads, and progressively delegated workload, escalations, systems and KPI accuracy.

  4. Create a light operating cadence

    Stand-ups ran every two days, Team Leads reported weekly, and one 30-minute COO review replaced fragmented leadership updates. Trello made ownership and progress visible.

  5. Turn evidence into Product priorities

    Artist feedback and operational data supported a shared Product OKR that reserved roughly one in three initiatives for an Operations priority.

  6. Prevent work instead of processing it

    With Product and Engineering, we clarified upload requirements and field mapping. We also built shared guidance, a knowledge base, specialist ownership and testing and translation guilds.

04 / Impact

Lower cost. Faster flow. Better quality.

≈50%

reduction in the monthly Operations cost run rate over 18 months, according to Finance reporting.

Headcount moved from approximately 30 to 15 through voluntary departures and roles not being backfilled. There were no layoffs. All six units remained active while reported volumes increased.

10 days → 1 to 2 days

Delivery Time

Average time from paid release registration to aggregator submission, reached within two months.

1 to 2 days → 15 days

Delivery lead time

Average time between aggregator acceptance and scheduled publication, reached within two months against a 21-day target.

5 min → 1 min

QA Touch Time

Average internal review time within six months; errors escaping QA later declined by approximately 15%.

3.0 → 4.5 / 5

Support Happiness Score

Within six months. Replies to Resolve fell from approximately 7 to 2, while average First Reply Time improved from approximately 48 hours to 24 hours or less.

−40%

Preventable errors

Field Update Requests and copyright-infringement claims each declined within six months. Aggregator tickets caused by pre-release errors fell by approximately 40% within eight months.

3 weeks → 2 weeks

Localisation turnaround

Average turnaround improved by approximately 30% within two months. Video-platform issue resolution also improved from approximately 15 days to 5 days within six months.

Figures are retrospective and rounded. Results were delivered with the Operations teams and cross-functional Product and Engineering partners.

05 / What this demonstrates

Judgment that carries through to execution.

Strategic judgment

Reframed a replacement hire as an operating-model decision.

Ownership

Acted within one week, before the vacancy was published.

Organisational design

Created clear accountability across six operating units.

Cross-functional leadership

Converted Operations evidence into shared Product priorities.

Talent development

Built responsibility through Team Leads, Seniors and guilds.

End-to-end execution

Connected structure, workflow, data and measurable outcomes.